Highland Park Community League Shares Address with HP Town Hall?
I noticed this comment left on another post this morning. I couldn’t risk letting it get buried- it’s a super good question. Bueller?
Can anyone at HP Town Hall explain to the taxpayers of Highland Park why the Highland Park Community League has the address of 4700 Drexel Drive, HP, Tx 75205 Tele. 214-521-4161.Well, The address coincidentally is that of HP Town Hall, and I dialed the telephone number and HP Town Hall answered. I was told to talk with Gayle Kirby, the Town’s Deputy Secretary! Ms. Kirby then told me that she only receives their mail!
So, let me understand this, the taxpayers of HP are funding the agendas of the HPCL, using HP employees, housing the HPCL with an address, and using HP employees to answer their listed telephone number.
What’s up with this!
45 comments to "Highland Park Community League Shares Address with HP Town Hall?"
I love your hand grenades. You throw them with a great change-up. I was responding to a comment that Max had made about your needing to be in city government. My response was that you were more effect outside, tossing hand grenades into the good ole boys fox holes. Really. Check the previous post you made about how your city wants you.
But, Tucker, why do you think HP Community League is sharing an address with Town Hall?
Because HP is not really a democracy.
Thanks for posting my complaint. You will also notice that the address the HPCL sent on their campaign letter, and to every HP resident, was from 3601 Cedar Springs, Dallas, Texas 75219. This was other than the address they have apparently posted on their website. I good smoke screen.
I’ve been campaigning for months in my door to door campaign, standing out in front of HP Town Hall every day of last week and today, and campaign central has been operating right under me at HP Town Hall.
I’m glad so many former mayors signed off on the HPCL letter and the many HPCL members because i think everyone of them needs to be held accountable.
If you would like, I will make you a copy of the letter that my wife and I were sent by the HPCL.
SALI LP owns most of it ($850,000) and Dexter & Company ($149,600)
Try this web address:
http://bbs.ethics.state.tx.us/public/344766.pdf
So I tried something else. I Googled “Highland Park Community League” and the League’s site was mentioned first. Google also provided a link to a cached version of the site. (For you typewriter users out there, the cached version is basically a snapshot Google took of the site at some point in the recent past.) According to Google’s note at the top of the cached version, they took this snapshot on April 22, 2010. The front page of the cached site has the same information about election dates, endorsements, etc. But guess what – at the bottom of the page, we have a street address and phone number for the Highland Park Community League: 4700 Drexel Drive, Highland Park, Texas 75205, Tel: (214) 521-4161.
The discrepancy between the current version of the League’s site and the cached version doesn’t necessarily mean that the League scrubbed their site after Mr. Tamborello brought up the address issue, but until we hear more from the League, I think we’re entitled to speculate.
As of right now, the same page is missing the HP Town Hall address and telephone number.
http://www.networksolutions.com/whois-search/hpcommunityleague.org
dallascad.org says that 3625 Normany is owned by IDCA Limited
http://www.dallascad.org/AcctDetailRes.aspx?ID=60136500030040000
Pulling up a blank on the address the DCAD goes to (10505 Shady Trail #100, 75220) so get your google working.
Anyone know who really owns it?
But Dan is all over this.
With regards to the who owns the property at 3601 Cedar Springs, public records indicate:
SALI LP owns the property at 3601 Cedar Springs. SALI LP is owned by Solminzer Inc, A Texas Corporation. The listed officers for Solminzer are J. Robert Carter, III and William F. Davis. Public records further indicate Carter and Davis are officers of Dexter & Company which resides/occupies the property at 3601 Cedar Springs Rd. I could not find out any information on CD Benefits but a wild guess would be Carter and Davis (CD).
Public records also indicate that Davis and Carter are residents of Highland Park.
A.B. commented that following the ownership of 3625 Normandy pointed to a dead end (10505 Shady Trail). His reference is to a tax record for 3625 Normandy which lists IDCA as the owner. IDCA is a limited partnership with the registered agent being James W. Lee, III (probably the attorney). Further research seems to indicate Schahrouz Ferdows could be the general partner behind IDCA, LTD. CBF Corp is also listed at the same address. James W. Lee, III is also the registered agent for this company. Officers for CBF are listed as KIM BROWN PO BOX 540427 DALLAS , TX 75354 and SHANE FERDOWS PO BOX 540427 DALLAS , TX 75354.
ARDCC, LTD. is listed as the owner of 10505 Shady Trail. Through a series of partnerships, it appears Schahrouz Ferdows owns/controls the property.
I don’t know what any of this means in terms of who is qualified to serve on the council. It would seem that someone is trying to hide who is supporting certain candidates. With regards to the legality of this matter, I cannot comment on as I do not know Texas Election Code. It could be something sinister or not.
The fact that the League scrubbed their site yesterday morning to hide that they share the same address as HP city hall seems sinister. The fact that the Town of HP’s deputy secretary answers the phone when you call the number posted on the League’s website (at least until it was scrubbed yesterday morning) seems sinister. The additional fact that said Town employee admits to accepting mail for the League seems sinister.
How can these things be sinister? Isn’t “sinister” too strong a word? Well maybe. But does Texas law permit registered political action committees (such as the HP Community League) to house themselves – at least on paper – in the town hall containing the very council members they endorse and presumably want to influence? And how does Texas law view a city employee acting as a telephone answering and mail forwarding service for the League? (Side question: does the League compensate the Town for these services?) And how does Texas law view the failure by the Town and the League for their apparent failure to disclose these arrangements?
Two lessons: (1) Sunlight scatters the ****roaches, and (2) the internet never forgets.
A review of the Town of Highland Park Charter found under Sec. 1.07.003 Standards of conduct
No officer or employee of the Town shall:
(3) Grant any special consideration, treatment or advantage to any citizen, individual, business organization or group beyond that which is available to every other citizen, individual, business organization or group.
Link http://codes.franklinlegal.net/highlandpark-flp/
The Town of Highland Park Employee Handbook states:
SUBJECT: POLITICAL ACTIVITY
LAST REVISED: February 2, 2007
STATEMENT OF POLICY:
An Employee may participate in all political activities which are not prohibited by this policy. An Employee may not engage in political activities while on duty or in uniform.
An Employee may not use his/her authority, influence, or official position as a Town of Highland Park Employee to influence the result of any election or nomination for elective office. An Employee may not directly or indirectly coerce, command, or advise any public officer or Employee to pay, lend or contribute anything of value to any person or organization for political purposes. Town-owned facilities, personnel, equipment, supplies, vehicles, printing facilities, local or long distance telephone services, or other resources shall not be used in or for any campaign or other political activity.
A General purpose committee campaign finance report from 2005 lists a Stephen Rogers as Campaign treasurer.
(Source – Lori Stahl, Dallas Morning News, 5-4-2010 @ 11:55 a.m.)
The Community League very much respects the separation between Town government affairs and its own activities. I can assure that the Town Staff has a similar view.
The Community League has endorsed six excellent candidates in this year’s election and strongly believes that they can provide excellent, experienced leadership for our Town in the years ahead. We encourage all eligible Town residents to vote in the election this Saturday, May 8.
Finally, if you are a Highland Park resident and a registered voter, please know that you are welcome to join the Community League. We have several civic events each year in which Town residents can learn more about our Town and community.
John McKnight
Thank you sir for that explanation, but in my opinion, it is a real Doozie. I have a response titled “True Colors” on my website. http://www.Tamborello.com
This is a partial list of the PACs that are registered for 2010. Please scroll down and note that the information for the Highland Park Community League has HP townhall as it’s address.
http://www.ethics.state.tx.us/tedd/paclistb.htm
Latest GPAC report dated 4-8-10:
http://204.65.203.5/public/448515.pdf
Most immediately prior GPAC report:
http://204.65.203.5/public/437549.pdf
Both of which list HP Townhall as the committee address.
This is the website for all of the GPACs associated with the Highland Park Community League:
http://www.ethics.state.tx.us/php/filerpdw.php?acct=00015696gpac
What say you?
I thought to myself, could this drama of the HPCL camapaign activities into HP Town Hall get any sinister? Well, according to Lori Stahl of the Dallas Morning News, a tid bit of more activities of the HPCL have surfaced.
It appears from her interview with HP Town Manager, Bill Lindley, that the HPCL “operates a charitable arm which has has donated money to pay for employee bonuses and the like.” (DMN, May 5, 2010)
Come on!!, now HP employees get a bonus check from the Polital Action Group HPCL?
Out of curiosity, does the post by Mr. McKnight directly above (and specifically the address / phone number “oversight” comment) and the response by “Its the internet, we know who you are” raise your brow?
Thanks.
Because we do our very best to investigate both sides of every question, I can only say that we’re looking into discrepancies and whether laws were broken.
I do appreciate your curiosity and your willingness to ask difficult questions.
Eric Nicholson did write a story about the Highland Park Community League’s address issues, and it’s in this week’s issue of Park Cities People.
Speaking as a taxpayer, I would like for the HPCL to refund the taxpayers of Highland Park for the use of taxpayer owned town hall, the use of taxpayer phone lines, taxpayer owned equipment use, and taxpayer funded mail services by the Town secretary’s office. And if I missed something, hopefully the HPCL will step up and let us taxpayers know.
I didn’t know about the failure to report the contributions, that’s a biggie. Thanks. I’ll be sure to add that one in my Texas Ethics Commission COMPLAINT for running the phone lines into Town Hall during early voting, using taxpayer property, equipment, mail services, and personnel us on the backs of the HP taxpayer.
Now I understand why the recent post card I received a few days ago by the HPCL was URGING the HP residents to vote for their slate. In my opinion, this is simply shameful.
HP Community League: Wednesday edition
6:08 PM Wed, May 05, 2010 | Permalink
Lori Stahl/Reporter
We’re still trying to figure out whether city officials knew that the Highland Park Community League listed Town Hall’s phone number and address on its website.
That’s a potential problem because the league operates a political action comittee that made endorsements in the upcoming municipal elections. Those kinds of groups are generally prohibited from using tax-funded resources such as equipment and personnel time at Town Hall.
Several city officials privately downplayed the situation, saying that the league also operates a charitable arm which has donated money to pay for employee bonuses and the like.
Today Town Manager Bill Lindley said staff was not aware that the address and phone number were on the league’s website. He said he asked that the information be taken off “to avoid any possible appearance of conflict during the election period.”
Asked whether that would change after the election, Lindley gave this response: “At this time, the Town believes this is a permanent change.”
Posted by Mustang @ 3:07 PM Thu, May 06, 2010
The statement from the Town that the “staff was not aware that the address and phone number were on the league’s website” is completely untrue. I had a very specific conversation regarding this subject with the Deputy Town Secretary in late October of 2009. I was informed that it was common practice to receive the HPCM mail and answer or refer any phone calls.
Leave a Reply