Comments on: LAX at SMU?

By: Ash

Ash — Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:24:30 +0000

Yes, Title IX.

By: Bradford Pearson

Bradford Pearson — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:46:08 +0000

@rabblerouser- I’m thinking it’s Title IX-related, but I could be wrong.

By: rabblerouser

rabblerouser — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:33:08 +0000

To Ash:
What is your basis for womens lax first?

By: Ash

Ash — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:09:58 +0000

Women’s lax would be first to go and then men. Since SMU already draws from all over the country they could actually have a fighting chance at recruiting nationally as well. All in all this a positive step forward for Texas lacrosse.

By: MGBHStar

MGBHStar — Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:24:06 +0000

It would be great to have a D1 Lacrosse program in DFW. Although the Big East lost its top lacrosse program, at Syracuse, to the ACC, which is arguably the strongest Lacrosse conference in the country, the remaining 6 teams (G’town, Notre Dame, Providence, St. Johns, Rutgers and Villanova) are worthy competitors. It would give the local athletes a chance to play closer to home at the D1 level. It would take a few years to get up to the same level as the other Big East teams, but you have start somewhere. Let’s hope Orsini gives it serious consideration.

By: XT

XT — Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:31:02 +0000

That would be very cool indeed.